Science versus Human Welfare? Understanding Attitudes toward Animal Use
Submitted on Feb 21, 2010 (Original item from 2009)
Animal Experimentation | Pharmaceutical, Medical or Biomedical Research
by
More Information...
More Information...
Short Description:
This comparison of the attitudes of scientists, animal welfarists, and laypersons toward four types of animal use found that scientists and animal welfarists had polarized views on all measures, while layperson attitudes fell in between.
Abstract:
Animal welfarists consistently opposed all types of animal use, while scientists supported the use of animals for medical research, but not typically for dissection, personal decoration, or entertainment. Animal welfarists exhibited stronger belief in the animal mind for thirteen animal types, while scientists believed that only some of the thirteen animal types had at least a moderate capacity for cognition and sentience.
Spot Check Number:
1299
Sponsor:
University of Portsmouth
Animal Type:
Various
Record Type:
Academic Paper, Journal Article
Research Method:
Unknown or Not Applicable
Geographic Region:
United States National
Number of Participants:
372
Population Descriptors:
Scientists, animal welfarists, laypersons
Year Conducted:
2009
PLEASE SUPPORT NONPROFIT RESEARCH FOR ANIMALS
Did you find this research helpful in your work for animals? If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.




Post new comment