Vegetarian Social, Psychological and Moral Development
How Readable Are Your Animal Advocacy Materials?
Submitted by Carol L. Glasser on Jan 17, 2012 Advocacy Strategies | Diet and Nutrition | Farmed Animals | Vegetarianism and VeganismThe most exciting project this new year, is the release of our latest study examining how easy it is for the average person to read and understand animal advocacy literature. Specifically, HRC partnered with VegFund and FARM to evaluate the readability of the most widely distributed vegan outreach pamphlets.
Readability of Vegan Outreach Literature
Submitted on Jan 17, 2012 (Original item from 2011) Advocacy Strategies | Diet and Nutrition | Farmed Animals | Vegetarianism and Veganism
by
To evaluate the readability of such materials in a more robust and transparent manner, the Humane Research Council (HRC) partnered with VegFund and FARM to test a selection of outreach materials that are commonly used by vegan advocates. The average readability scores placed these materials in the range of the 11th grade reading level or higher, which is three to four grade levels higher than the average U.S. adult.
Where To Go From Here: Thoughts on Preventing Veg'n Recidivism
Submitted by on Dec 20, 2011 Diet and Nutrition | General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and VeganismVeg'n Recidivism: Why is it Happening?
Submitted by on Dec 09, 2011 General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and Veganism
Advocates can use sociological theories to understand some of the social and cultural barriers to vegetarian maintenance. During the course of my interviews with ex-veg'ns I found six common reasons as to why they struggled with the practice. These include family relationships, identity, the ambiguity of the veg'n label, gender roles, the influence of peers, and the temporary nature of trends.Gender Differences in Family and Peer Reaction to the Adoption of a Vegetarian Diet
Submitted on Dec 08, 2011 (Original item from 2010) General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and Veganism
by
This paper examines reactions of peers and family members to college students when they decide to become vegetarian. The author found, contrary to some other research, that men had more leniency from those in their social circles. Women were often confronted with paternalism, but overcame it with what the author labeled "moral resilience."
HRC Happenings: Guest Bloggers and Grassroots Research
Submitted by Che Green on Dec 01, 2011 Advocacy Strategies | Companion Animals | General Animal Protection | Research Tools and Methods | Vegetarianism and VeganismDo you know a small organization doing great work for animals? If so, please make sure they hear about HRC's Grassroots Research Fund, the deadline for which is now just one month away (January 1st). The group(s) we select will receive pro bono research projects of up to $5,000 to help them evaluate and improve their work and help more animals. Also, any donations to HRC during the month of December will be earmarked for the Grassroots Research Fund so that we can help even more small groups in 2012. And be sure to check out our two guest blogs from the past month covering the topics of Big Black Dog syndrome and vegetarian/vegan recidivism. Thank you for reading!
Gender Specific Preferences and Attitudes Towards Meat
Submitted on Nov 26, 2011 (Original item from 2002) General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and Veganism
by
Researchers used surveys and taste tests to examine gender differences in preferences for meat. They found that the color, flavor, odor, and texture affect preference for meat, in that order. Overall, women were less likely to prefer red meat than men.
Returning to Meat: Who is Doing It, How it Happens, and What This Means for the Veg'n Movement
Submitted by on Nov 22, 2011 General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and VeganismDon't Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
Submitted on Nov 12, 2011 (Original item from 2011) Farmed Animals | General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and Veganism
by
Researchers conducted three studies to examine how the mind—both beliefs about animal minds and the mental work necessary to create a shift between food animals and other animals—allows for people to simultaneously love animals and eat meat.
The Effect of Categorization as Food on the Perceived Moral Standing of Animals
Submitted on Nov 08, 2011 (Original item from 2011) Farmed Animals | General Animal Protection | Vegetarianism and Veganism
by
To better understand how it is that most people can simultaneously love animals and eat meat, this study examines how classifying an animal as "food" influences attitudes about that animal. The researchers found that categorization of an animal as "food" changes beliefs about an animal's capacity to suffer, thereby reducing moral concern for the animal and allowing people to love some animals while continuing to engage in meat eating.
PLEASE SUPPORT NONPROFIT RESEARCH FOR ANIMALS
Did you find this research helpful in your work for animals? If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.



